Conventionally, medical malpractice is argued using inductive reasoning. There is nothing wrong with inductive reasoning. It is a component of critical thinking. However, it is just a component. Inductive reasoning is more subjective than objective and the influences of selection bias, avoidance bias, and confirmation bias are undetectable. Deductive reasoning is also a component of
Deductive reasoning in medical malpractice: a quantitative approach originally appeared in KevinMD.com.
Whether you are a professional looking for a new job or a representative of an organization who needs workforce solutions - we are here to help.